У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно Landmark Cases on Constitution | Indian Polity Important Cases | 2019 или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, которое было загружено на ютуб. Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru
Constitution of India Course: https://learn.finology.in/courses/leg... Hello! In this video we will discuss about some important landmark cases on constitution. For better understanding i have divided these cases in different categories like: Our 1st category is preamble. So you tell me, what is the significance of preamble? Is it a part of the constitution? Can it be amended? Can any law by legislature be invalidates, only on the basis of preamble? Lets know about these cases. -Re Berubari Case -Golaknath v. State of Punjab -Keshvananda Bharti v. State of Kerala -Indra Nehru Gandhi case -Minerva Mills v. UOI important cases on Art 368 important cases relating to fundamental rights. Our 2nd category is fundamental rights which are discussed from Article 12 to 35. Let have a look: -Marbury v. Madison L. CHandrakumar v. Union of India -, A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras -Romesh Thapar v State of Madras -State of Gujarat v. Ambika Mills -Basheshar Nath v. Income Tax Commissioner -state of Bombay v. F.N. Balsara -Anwar Ali v. State of West Bengal -Randhir Singh v. Union of India -E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu -D.P. Joshi v. State of M.P. -Champkam Dorairajan v. State of Madras -T. Devadasn case -N.M.Thomas v. State of Kerala -Akhil Bhartiya Soshit Karmachari v. Union of India -Indra Swahney v. Union of India -Romesh Thapar v. State of Madras -Hamdard Dawakhana v. Union of India -A.K.Gopalan case -ADM Jabalpur v. Shivakant Shukla Maneka Gandhi v. UOI -K.N. Puttaswamy v. UOI -Mohini Jain v. Case of Karnataka Article 25 to 28 deals with minority rights and secularism. Lets check these two cases: -S.R. Bommai v. Union of India -Md. Hamid Qureshi v. State of Bihar Next category is judiciary. See, appointment of Judges of Supreme Court is dealt in article 124 and appointment of high court’s judges is dealt in article 217. What procedure has been laid down under these articles? Now what is the meaning of world consultation in both of these articles. We have 3 landmark verdicts for this: S.P.Gupta v. Union of India (First Judges Case) -Supreme Court Advocate on Record Case (Second Judges case) In re Special Reference (Third Judges Case) Next category is emergency. In topic of Emergency. In the topic of emergency, amendments ar more important than the cases. Lets look at two different cases. -Minerva mills v. Union of India -S.R. Bommai v. Union of India Next category is of amendments under article 368: -Shankari prasad case -Sajjan Singh’s case -Golaknath v. UOI -Keshavananda Bharti V. State of Kerala I hope that you liked this video - these cases are very important with respect to NET 2019, CLAT 2019 and also for basic understanding of Indian Constitution and Indian Polity. Kindly subscribe to my channel to keep receiving such updates. In the next video, we will discuss some of the important recent judgments. Here is a PDF with sample MCQ`s: https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Y8e... ***************************************** Courses- Constitution of India Course: https://learn.finology.in/courses/leg... Current Affairs-https://learn.finology.in/courses/leg... Jurisprudence-https://learn.finology.in/courses/leg... ***************************************** Do let me know in the comment box, how did you find this Video! Instagram: finologylegal