Скачать с ютуб CHEQUE BOUNCE ❌ Case - New Judgement on Acquittal | Section 138 NI Act в хорошем качестве

CHEQUE BOUNCE ❌ Case - New Judgement on Acquittal | Section 138 NI Act

Successful CHEQUE BOUNCE - New Judgement on Acquittal | Section 138 NI Act What is the 138 Act? What is the penal code 138 in India? Is 138 a criminal case? In this latest episode of Decode the Law we will discuss about Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act. OFFENCES U/S 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT and latest judgement. In this case it was held that accused often gets away with an acquittal, despite having tendered and even admitting to the cheque, merely because the complainant is unable to produce documents to support the existence of the debt (usually in the form of a friendly loan provided in cash, which does not have any document trail). Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act: An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is committed no sooner a cheque drawn by accused on an account being maintained by him in a bank for discharge of debt/liability is returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or for the reason that the amount exceeds the arrangement made with the bank ... Judgement link- https://www.livelaw.in/pdf_upload/ni-... 00:00- intro 00:50- facts of the case & decision 06:35- suggestion Is section 138 a criminal offence? What is the maximum punishment for Section 138? Cheque Bounce Case Acquittal: latest judgements A cheque bounce case can result in acquittal if there is insufficient evidence, especially when the transaction was based on a friendly understanding without formal documentation. In some cases, individuals issue cheques during personal dealings, but if there’s no clear record—like promissory notes or written agreements—proving that the cheque was issued as a legal obligation, the court may dismiss the case. Without concrete evidence of intent or liability, proving the case can become challenging, leading to acquittal. Learn more about cheque bounce legalities and how lack of evidence can impact your case. Yours Queries - Section 138 punishment Section 138 in Hindi Section 138 of Negotiable instrument Act Section 138 IPC Cheque bounce Section 138 How to defend Section 138 Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act time limit Section 138 CrPC #chequebounce #supremecourt #decodethelaw This video is made solely with the purpose of spreading awareness and educating the viewers. The information demonstrated and explained in the video are true to the best of our team’s knowledge and research. Nevertheless, if any error is committed, the same was never intended to be and is absolutely unintentional. In the event of any inadvertent error, kindly email us at [email protected] (mail subject : FEEDBACK) for necessary action, to resolve any error/dispute amicably. ________________________________________________________ Let's Connect on social media: 📱Instagram:   / papiiiaaa   🐦Twitter: www.twitter.com/decode_law ☹️📖 Facebook:   / decodethelaw   🔭Telegram: https://t.me/DecodeTheLaw_Official _____________________________________________________________________ 🟨 Related videos:- Section 498a ipc-    • FALSE CASE अब से मेंटेनेंस नहीं मिलेग...      • पति के पक्ष में FALSE 498A Case Big J...      • पति Maintenance से कैसे बचे | 498A ca...      • सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने जारी किए दिशानिर्देश...   Landmark Judgement:-    • The END 498A ❌ | Landmark Judgement S...      • Landmark Judgement of Supreme Court o...      • 125 The END ❌ खत्म! | 125 MAINTENANCE...      • 498A IPC Landmark Judgement Supreme C...   Property Law-    • Never Invest in Property before check...   Labour Law-    • How Much Earn Mesothelioma Lawyer | M...   Related videos link-    • The Judgment of Supreme Court - Decod...   ______________________________________________________ 🟨 DISCLAIMER 1. The content in this channel is strictly for educational and informational purposes and is not intended to be legal advice or recommendation of any kind whatsoever. Viewers should always take their own due diligence and own accord on any information perceived from this video to form their own opinion & best judgment. 2. The materials contained in this video can't replace a substitute for the services of trained professionals in any field including but not limited to financial, legal, or psychological matters. The video is not warranted for content accuracy or any other implied or explicit purposes. 3. This video is not intended to spread rumours or offend or hurt the sentiments of any religion, community, or individuals or to bring disrespect to any person living or dead whatsoever. 4. Some content may have been used as "fair use" for the purpose such as criticism, comment, teaching, scholarship & research, etc. under section 107 of the Copyright Act, 1976. Fair use of content is permitted by the copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. All credit for Copyright materials used herein goes to the respected owners if any and I do not have any claim on it whatsoever.  if there, is unintentional and deeply regretted.