Русские видео

Сейчас в тренде

Иностранные видео




Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru



13 British Royals' CONTROVERSIAL BUSINESS DEALS That Shocked the World

🏰📈 14 Controversial Royal Business Deals Unveiled! | British Royals & Financial Scandals Dive into the world of British royalty and explore 14 shocking instances where members of the royal family found themselves entangled in controversial business dealings. From selling properties above market value to dubious associations with oligarchs, these scandals have marred the royal family's reputation and raised serious ethical questions. 👑 Highlights Include: Prince Andrew's Questionable Property Sale (2007): Sold Sunninghill Park to a Kazakh billionaire for £3 million over the asking price, sparking conflict of interest concerns. King Charles' Duchy Originals Controversy (2009): Earned a hefty profit by selling his organic food company, leading to accusations of exploiting his royal status for personal gain. Dumfries House Acquisition (2007): King Charles' £45 million deal criticized for using royal influence to secure funding. Prince Harry's Invictus Games Logo Issue (2014): Faced backlash for logo plagiarism, questioning the vetting process and Harry’s oversight. Poundbury Development Criticism: King Charles accused of using his position to promote personal architectural preferences. Prince William's Air Ambulance Role (2014): Allegations of nepotism as he joined East Anglian Air Ambulance without the typical professional rescue credentials. King Charles and the Chelsea Barracks Saga (2009): Intervened in development plans, leading to accusations of undemocratic interference. Sarah Ferguson's Business Ventures: Criticized for leveraging royal connections for personal profit. The Queen's Offshore Investments (2006): Sparked debate over the ethics of investing in tax havens. Prince Andrew and Kazakh Oligarchs: Continuously embroiled in controversies due to associations with Central Asian elites. King Charles's Alternative Medicine Advocacy: Critiqued for promoting untested treatments. Prince William and Trophy Hunting (2014): Accused of hypocrisy in his conservation efforts. Prince Andrew and the Epstein Scandal (2019): Severely damaged the Crown’s integrity with questionable associations. Repeat of the Chelsea Barracks Story: Highlighting King Charles' influence over architectural aesthetics. 🔍 Our Take: The British royal family's business ventures often blur the lines between public duty and private gain, leading to a slew of controversies. These incidents raise critical questions about the use of royal status in commercial activities and the ethical implications thereof. 💬 We Want to Hear From You! Which royal business scandal surprised or shocked you the most? Share your thoughts in the comments section below. 🔔 Stay Updated on Royal Scandals! Don't forget to like, share, and subscribe. Click the notification bell to never miss an update on future royal controversies. 👋 Thanks for Watching! Until next time, keep the conversation going! --- 🟢 Must Watch Videos: ▪ Royal Family Secrets Only Insiders Know: 15 Intriguing Revelations ➜    • Royal Family Secrets Only Insiders Kn...   ▪ 15 Times British Royals Were Caught Acting Irresponsibly ➜    • 15 Times British Royals Were Caught A...   ▪ 15 Times the British Royals Got Caught Lying ➜    • 15 Times the British Royals Got Caugh...   ————— Voiceover By: Catherine Divaris Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, Music, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statutes that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational, or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. Reference: https://bit.ly/3l8GUbc Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: 1)This video has no negative impact. 2)This video is also for entertainment purposes. 3)It is transformative in nature.

Comments