Русские видео

Сейчас в тренде

Иностранные видео


Скачать с ютуб Burden of proof (Indian Evidence Act,1872) Section 101-105 в хорошем качестве

Burden of proof (Indian Evidence Act,1872) Section 101-105 5 лет назад


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru



Burden of proof (Indian Evidence Act,1872) Section 101-105

CLICK THE LINK GIVEN BELOW TO DOWNLOAD MY MOBILE ANDROID APPLICATION https://uiuir.courses.store/download-... TO WATCH FULL COURSE VIDEOS CLICK THE FOLLOWING LINK https://sudhirsachdevaclasses.com/ Burden of proof Whoever desires any Court to give judgment as to any legal right or liability dependent on the existence of facts which he asserts, must prove that those facts exist. When a person is bound to prove the existence of any fact, it is said that he burden of proof lies on that person. Section 102. On whom burden of proof lies The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. Section 103 Burden of proof as to particular fact The burden of proof as to any particular fact lies on that person who wishes the Court to believe in its existence, unless it is provided by any law that the proof of that fact shall lie on any particular person. Section 104 Burden of proving fact to be proved to make evidence admissible The burden of proving any fact necessary to be proved in order to enable any person to give evidence of any other fact is on the person who wishes to give such evidence. Section 105 Burden of proving that case of accused comes within exceptions. When a person is accused of any offence, the burden of proving the existence of circumstances bringing the case within any of the General Exceptions in the Indian Penal Code 45 of 1860, or within any special exception or proviso contained in any other part of the same Code, or in any law defining the offence, is upon him, and the Court shall presume the absence of such circumstances.

Comments