Скачать с ютуб Lock-free Atomic Shared Pointers Without a Split Reference Count? It Can Be Done! - Daniel Anderson в хорошем качестве

Lock-free Atomic Shared Pointers Without a Split Reference Count? It Can Be Done! - Daniel Anderson

https://cppcon.org/ --- Lock-free Atomic Shared Pointers Without a Split Reference Count? It Can Be Done! - Daniel Anderson - CppCon 2023 https://github.com/CppCon/CppCon2023 Smart pointers such as std::unique_ptr and std::shared_pointer are the recommended way to manage dynamic memory in C++ programs. At least, that is what we try to teach people. But what if you are writing parallel and concurrent code, can we will make use of std::shared_ptr? Yes, but only if concurrent modifications are done via a std::atomic＜std::shared_prt＞! Atomic smart pointers were recently introduced to the C++20 standard for this purpose, however, existing implementations in major standard libraries are not lock-free. This makes them impractical for applications with heavy concurrency, as their performance degrades badly. There are several well known implementations of a lock-free atomic shared pointer, such as Folly's, and Anthony William's which is included in a commercial library. These implementations and several others are all based on the so-called "split reference count" technique, which solves the problem of atomically modifying the reference count and the object pointer when performing an update operation. This technique is difficult to make fully portable however, since it either relies on a double-word compare-exchange operation, or packs a reference count inside the "unused" high-order bits of the pointer. In this talk, we describe a strategy for implementing lock-free atomic shared pointers without a split reference count. The solution is surprisingly simple and elegant, as it does not require adding any fields to the shared pointer or atomic shared pointer and does not hide anything inside the bits of the pointer. Under the hood, it makes use of hazard pointers and deferred reclamation. Since hazard pointers are on track for inclusion in C++26, this implementation is timely, simple to implement with nearly-standard C++, and achieves excellent performance. --- Daniel Anderson Daniel Anderson is an assistant teaching professor at Carnegie Mellon University, where he recently graduated with a PhD in computer science focusing on parallel computing and parallel algorithms. Daniel teaches algorithms classes to hundreds of undergraduate students and spends his remaining time writing C++ libraries that aim to make parallel computing easier and more accessible to non-experts. He is the recipient of a Best Paper Award from the ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architecture (SPAA) conference. --- Videos Filmed & Edited by Bash Films: http://www.BashFilms.com YouTube Channel Managed by Digital Medium Ltd: https://events.digital-medium.co.uk --- Registration for CppCon: https://cppcon.org/registration/ #cppcon #cppprogramming #cpp