Скачать с ютуб Molly Qerim Fired from ESPN Broadcast for HATING on Caitlin Clark —Stephen A. Smith EXPLODES! в хорошем качестве

Molly Qerim Fired from ESPN Broadcast for HATING on Caitlin Clark —Stephen A. Smith EXPLODES!

Caitlin Clark has taken the WNBA by storm, breaking records and shutting down critics left and right. But one critic, ESPN's Molly Qerim, went a step too far, claiming Clark’s presence on the USA Olympic team would "hurt the game." Now, with Clark continuing her historic season, Molly is walking back her words. This is how Caitlin Clark made Molly Qerim regret doubting her. Stay tuned to see how this showdown between an emerging superstar and a high-profile critic unfolded. When the USA Olympic team roster was announced, Caitlin Clark’s omission sent shockwaves through the basketball world. For a player as dominant and widely regarded as the future of women’s basketball, being left off the roster was puzzling to many. Cheryl Reeve, Team USA’s coach, explained the decision, citing Clark’s inexperience at the professional level and the fact that she missed training camp due to her college commitments during March Madness. But the real stir came when Molly Qerim weighed in on ESPN’s First Take. She boldly claimed that putting Caitlin Clark on the roster would “hurt the game,” and implied that the decision to leave her off the team was justified. Molly argued that adding Clark to the team would prioritize marketing over merit, essentially suggesting that Clark wasn’t skilled enough to deserve a spot. Her words sparked immediate backlash, with fans and analysts pointing out that Clark’s on-court performances had already proven her to be one of the most talented players in the WNBA, even in her rookie season. RIGHT NOTICE: The Copyright Laws of the United States recognize a “fair use” of copyrighted content. Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act states: “Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.” This video and our YouTube channel, in general, may contain certain copyrighted works that were not specifically authorized to be used by the copyright holder(s), but which we believe in good faith are protected by federal law and the fair use doctrine for one or more of the reasons