Скачать с ютуб Criminal Case | Recovery Evidence | Recovery of bloodstained weapon | Jeevagan Legal | SC Judgment | в хорошем качестве

Criminal Case | Recovery Evidence | Recovery of bloodstained weapon | Jeevagan Legal | SC Judgment |

Appreciation of Recovery Evidence in Criminal cases.. In the recent case Allarakha Habib Memon Etc. versus State of Gujarat (Neutral Citation: 2024 INSC 590), the hon'ble Supreme Court of India observed that sole circumstance of recovery of bloodstained weapon cannot form the basis of conviction unless the same was connected with the murder of the deceased by the accused. In that context, the Court observed that, "Even presuming that the FSL Reports conclude that the blood group found on the weapons recovered at the instance of the accused matched with the blood group of the deceased, this circumstance in isolation, cannot be considered sufficient so as to link the accused with the crime. In this regard, reliance can be placed on the judgment of Mustkeem alias Sirajudeen versus State of Rajasthan , wherein the Court held that sole circumstance of recovery of bloodstained weapon cannot form the basis of conviction unless the same was connected with the murder of the deceased by the accused. Upon an overall appreciation of the evidence available on record, the hon'ble Court is of the opinion that the prosecution has failed to lead convincing evidence establishing the guilt of the accused appellants beyond all manner of doubt so as to hold the accused appellants responsible for the crime. Kindly subscribe to our Channel JEEVAGAN LEGAL, like and share this video and don't forget to press the bell icon so that you will never miss any video uploaded in our Channel JEEVAGAN LEGAL. Thanks to: #filmora #filmoramobile