У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно The Suprisingly Simple Alternative to NHST: Model Comparisons или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, которое было загружено на ютуб. Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru
Learning objectives #1. Model comparison vs. NHST approach #2. Difference between a nested and non-nested model #3. Complexity vs. fit tradeoff #4. Two reasons p-values are okay in model comparisons #5. Metrics we use to compare models #6. Know which metrics we can use for non-nested models link to NHST: • Probability, Part 7: What is Null Hyp... p-hacking video: • Probability 8: What is wrong with NHS... Technical sidenote: R square tells us the proportion of variance explained, so a 1% change in R squared means we have explained an additional 1% of the variance. But, if we equate proportion of variance explained with predictive accuracy (which actually isn’t unreasonable), I suppose you could argue a 1% change in variance explain equates to a 1% improvement in accuracy (at least relative to a model with no predictors). How’s that sound? I don’t know. I doubt anyone reads these technical side notes anyways.