Скачать с ютуб Constructivism versus Interpretivism в хорошем качестве

Constructivism versus Interpretivism

This short video explains the basic differences between constructivism and interpretivism as research paradigms. Constructivists embrace the value-laden nature of research, emphasising reflexivity and ethical responsibility, and valuing the co-construction of knowledge with participants. This paradigm acknowledges the subjective and interpretive nature of knowledge creation, viewing it as a strength that enriches understanding and contributes to the depth and authenticity of research findings. Constructivist researchers are also often concerned with the social implications of their research, seeking not only to understand the world but also to contribute positively towards social change. While interpretivism recognises the influence of researcher and participant values, it leans more towards understanding and interpreting the values and meanings inherent within the study context. Consequently, they believe that the researcher’s role is to immerse themselves in the participants’ experiences to gain a deep, empathetic understanding of their perspectives. Read more about constructivism and interpretivism in an academic version of this video (free to read): https://doi.org/10.26180/27013843 To cite this article, you can reference it as: Pretorius, L. (2024). Demystifying research paradigms: Navigating ontology, epistemology, and axiology in research. [Pre-print]. Monash University Research Repository. https://doi.org/10.26180/27013843 Copyright Monash University