Русские видео

Сейчас в тренде

Иностранные видео


Скачать с ютуб What does "L" Quality Even Mean Anymore? - A Point in Focus S6E8 в хорошем качестве

What does "L" Quality Even Mean Anymore? - A Point in Focus S6E8 7 дней назад


Если кнопки скачивания не загрузились НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru



What does "L" Quality Even Mean Anymore? - A Point in Focus S6E8

Two topics on today's podcast. First, I was contacted by another creator, @33rdframe, who wanted to share a 3D printed add-on for the R5C with me. I looked, and it looked interesting, especially the cable clamp that he built for it, so I'm passing it on. It's free, or at least he's giving away the STL files so you can print your own. You can find his video here :    • This Mod Turns your R5C into a solo F...   That said, the main topic for today is the question: What does L image quality really mean anymore? Canon has always advertised their L lenses as having the best image quality they can muster. However, the marketing material for more and more lower tier lenses, like the recently released RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM are claiming to have L image quality. Simultaneously, and across the board, Canon's lens designers have embraced designs that rely more and more on extensive and significant software corrections; especially for distortion. And while this could be easily expected in entry level lenses, this design ethos has been used on many high end L series lenses as well. This isn't to say that this is necessarily bad. Canon's RF 35mm f/1.4L VCM uses this extreme distortion design, and still delivers higher corner resolution than the EF 35mm f/1.4L II USM did using a traditional optical approach. Admittedly, L image quality, was never something publicly defined by Canon. It's always just meant the best they could offer. But with more and more of what use to be done optically being handed over to software, does that change the calculus? Or is it just that my thinking about how a lens should be designed is antiquated, and the only thing that matters is how the images look, regardless of how you get to them? ══════════════════════ 💵 Support the Channel and Content Like This 💵 ══════════════════════ ⯈ Click the Thanks Button under the video. ⯈ Use PayPal: https://paypal.me/pointsinfocus ⯈ Buy yourself something from the affiliate links below. ⯈ Amazon.com: https://amzn.to/4dloDzU ══════════════════════ Gear I Use to Make Videos ══════════════════════ (Affiliate links) ⯈ Canon EOS R5 - https://amzn.to/3uJNNVI ⯈ Canon EOS R5 Mark II - ⯈ Canon EOS R5C - https://amzn.to/4goyveX ⯈ SmallRig NP-F Battery Adapter Pro (power for extended shooting time)- https://amzn.to/3ybCY3h ⯈ Anker Prime 27650 mAh Power Bank - https://amzn.to/4dsP8o4 ⯈ Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8L IS USM - https://amzn.to/37SuLDw ⯈ Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS USM - https://amzn.to/3M9I0yQ ⯈ Rode NTG2 - ⯈ Rode Wireless Go - ⯈ Zoom F6 - https://amzn.to/2TWsSvo ══════════════════════ Chapters ══════════════════════

Comments