Скачать с ютуб Part 1. Biblical "Divorce Exemptions" Clauses Debunked. "Except it be for fornication" в хорошем качестве

Part 1. Biblical "Divorce Exemptions" Clauses Debunked. "Except it be for fornication"

Biblical Exemptions? Except it be for fornication? What exactly does that mean? Please smash the thumbs up button if you found this helpful. Also check out Dr David Pawson    • Divorce and Remarriage by David Pawson   I just do not believe that Jesus meant the exemption clause applied to a fully consummated marriage. Jesus would never have taught that a family could be broken up because someone committed sin? He would have taught to forgive just as we have been forgiven and to keep the peace and keep the children clean as in 1 Corr 7. Had Jesus not made that exemption, many would have charged his father of sin citing that he was going to divorce his betrothed wife when Jesus taught that divorce was a sin. We would have a contradiction, because the text said Joseph was a "just" man. A just man would not sinfully put away a wife. So he could justly put away his wife as they were still not consummated. The test made it clear that they did not come together or "lay" together. Are you with me? So the only just way you could divorce your wife is if she was merely you betrothed wife, not your fully consummated wife. This make circumstantial sense as well. As soon as consummation happens after the final dedication, a baby or babies (twins +) could be on the way. Right? That is a biological fact. So, thus a husband is bound with no way out as soon as consummation occurs, no exemption. If consummation had not been reached we can understand that if the other one fornicated and violated the marital commitment at that point, either one (husband or wife) was free to get out of it unscathed and with a clear title. I believe that betrothal argument even cuts deeper than that too. It also means if you were merely engaged to a wife and sent her away for other reasons (other than fornication) and remarried another one, you could be guilty of adultery! Imagine that! This ties into the common narrative of the fact there is only one true "love." "The first cut is the deepest." "You never get over your first love..." "Love can touch just one time and last for a lifetime." Remember God marries man and woman, not us. People need to understand the serious nature of even courtship and dating lest they get burned and scared for life. So man was never meant to switch from date to date, woman to woman, wife to wife. God designed us not to. Perhaps that is why remarriage suffer a much higher divorce rate (80%). But this careful and safe interpretation also synchronizes with His teachings" wherefore, what God has put together, let not man separate." I would add, you cannot truly separate them, and be with out sin. Again, when Christians see and hear enough of these apparent “exemption clause” remarriage cases, some just assume, “it must be true” or, “it must be biblical OK.” They may not even do biblical investigation on the matter… or perhaps they just don’t want to. These “exemption” interpretations are a huge stretch to say the least. Couples imagining that they are blessed and without sin as they remarry has had devastating effects and fallout in the Christian community. This is true even if they plead that they are the, “innocent party” who has been offended. But who is truly without sin and, “innocent” among us? Who has never sinned in some way in their lives? This devastation family failure has gone on for centuries and will likely continue until the Day of the Lord. But we are a free people in Christ and can get it! We can understand this and be blessed as we do. Let us address Matthew 5:31-32 19: 3-9 and 1 Corr 12-16 How serious is this false teaching and narrative on marriage? The Lord Jesus has spoken His word on this issue clearly. We need to subject ourselves to it with all understanding, humility and repentance. We need to be broken on this. What do we read? Absolute scriptural ordinances from the Lord Himself. Luke 16: 18 “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries one who is divorced from a husband commits adultery.” Mark 10 6 “But from the beginning of creation, God MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE. “FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh. “What therefore God has joined together, let no man separate.” 10 “In the house the disciples began questioning Him about this again. And He said to them, Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her; and if she herself divorces her husband and marries another man, she is committing adultery.” Interestingly, we note from the well-known key account of the absolute verse in Mark, vs 10 says “the disciples began questioning Him about this again.” Why did they want to dig further into this issue and clarify it? This is unusual.