У нас вы можете посмотреть бесплатно How much Fraud is there in Psychology? или скачать в максимальном доступном качестве, которое было загружено на ютуб. Для скачивания выберите вариант из формы ниже:
Если кнопки скачивания не
загрузились
НАЖМИТЕ ЗДЕСЬ или обновите страницу
Если возникают проблемы со скачиванием, пожалуйста напишите в поддержку по адресу внизу
страницы.
Спасибо за использование сервиса savevideohd.ru
#fraud #science #philosophy Recent years have seen a rise in discovered fraudulent scientific research. But how much of a problem is fraud really, and what can be done about it? Find out in this video! If you want to read more about this topic, we recommend Stuart Ritchie's "Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth" - which you can get with our affiliate link to support us: https://amzn.to/48RfpsP [1] Y. Bhattacharjee, “The Mind of a Con Man,” The New York Times, Apr. 26, 2013. Accessed: Dec. 08, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/ma... [2] D. A. Stapel and S. Lindenberg, “Coping with Chaos: How Disordered Contexts Promote Stereotyping and Discrimination,” Science, vol. 332, no. 6026, pp. 251–253, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1126/science.1201068. [3] R. Craig, A. Cox, D. Tourish, and A. Thorpe, “Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done?,” Research Policy, vol. 49, no. 4, p. 103930, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930. [4] D. Fanelli, “How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 5, p. 11, 2009. [5] J. Stricker and A. Günther, “Scientific Misconduct in Psychology: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Estimates and New Empirical Data,” Zeitschrift für Psychologie, vol. 227, no. 1, pp. 53–63, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1027/2151-2604/a000356. [6] A. Marcus and I. Oransky, “What’s Behind Big Science Frauds?,” The New York Times, May 23, 2015. Accessed: Dec. 07, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/23/op... [7] J. K. Tijdink, R. Verbeke, and Y. M. Smulders, “Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists,” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 64–71, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1177/1556264614552421. [8] S. Ritchie, Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2020. [9] W. Stroebe, T. Postmes, and R. Spears, “Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science,” Perspect Psychol Sci, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 670–688, Nov. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1745691612460687. [10] U. Simonsohn, “Just Post It: The Lesson From Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone,” Psychol Sci, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 1875–1888, Oct. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0956797613480366. [11] J. M. Wicherts, “Psychology must learn a lesson from fraud case,” Nature, vol. 480, no. 7375, p. 7, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1038/480007a. [12] J. P. Simmons, L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn, “False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant,” Psychological Science, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1359–1366, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0956797611417632.