Скачать с ютуб Three Unintended Consequences of Ending Negative Gearing в хорошем качестве

Three Unintended Consequences of Ending Negative Gearing

In this clip from The Property Couch, we dive into three unintended consequences of scrapping negative gearing. With higher rental costs, shrinking middle-class wealth, and the risk of big business monopolising the property market, eliminating negative gearing may create more problems than it solves. We explore how negative gearing encourages private investment, helps Australians self-fund their future, and prevents reliance on government housing. But if removed, will the burden shift to higher taxes and increased dependence on big corporations? Join us as we unpack the potential risks and realities. Timestamps: 00:00 – Introduction: Unintended Consequences of Ending Negative Gearing 00:21 – Unintended Consequence 1: Less Rental Supply as Investors Opt Out 01:10 – Unintended Consequence 2: Higher Rents Due to Rising Costs for Investors 01:59 – Unintended Consequence 3: Shift from Private Investors to Big Business & Government Control 03:27 – Trickle-Down Economics or Corporate Monopoly? The Impact on Middle Australia 04:06 – Can Governments Provide Effective Housing Without Raising Taxes? 04:42 – Wrap-Up: Be Careful What You Wish For – Risks of a Rental Monopoly P.S. This is just a snippet from our latest Ep 515 | The Truth About Negative Gearing & Capital Gains Tax (LIVE)! For the full scoop, check it out here 👉 https://thepropertycouch.com.au/ep515... p.p.s. And feel free to send in your questions here 👉 https://thepropertycouch.com.au/topics/! We would love to answer them on the show #NegativeGearing #PropertyInvestment #RentalMarket #TrickleDownEconomics #HousingCrisis #TaxPolicy #RealEstateAustralia #PropertyCouch #BigBusiness #MiddleClassWealth #HousingAffordability #GovernmentDependency #BuildToRent